Thursday, November 8, 2018

A memory to remember - My review of '96 [Bonus - Ravishanker's 96 cartoon]

Kamal Haasan once presided over a debate where the topic was, art house pictures vs. commercial cinema.  His verdict was, “Artistically made commercial cinema is what will endure.”  His judgment could be summed up in one number – 96!  96 takes place during the course of a night, focusing on a man (Vijay Sethupathi) and woman (Trisha Krishnan) who, partly owing to choices and largely due to destiny, took different paths in life and are meeting after two decades at a high-school reunion.  What happens during the course of that one night is the crux of this tale, lovingly brought to screen - and to life - by writer and director Prem Kumar.

                                                                                                       
For a first-time director, Prem Kumar comes across as a filmmaker completely assured of himself and his command over the medium.  This is a beautifully photographed movie - the unobtrusively lovely work is by Mahendran Jayaraju and Shanmuga Sundaram.  Simple shots like the school kid driving a cycle across a puddle of water are aesthetically done.  And the close-ups of the lead pair capture every minute change in expression.  Every choice of lighting is tasteful yet purposeful – a case in point, the use of the flashlight in the power cut sequence.  The tools that the director utilizes to bring the 90s to life too, are not flashy, yet make us smile– a floppy disk in the hands of a Computer Science student, a student singing a snatch of “Thendral Vandhu Theendum…”  Govind Vasantha's exquisite score ("Kathale Kathale..." is a haunting melody) too fits the mood of several scenes in an undemonstrative yet impactful manner.

In addition to being an aesthete, Prem Kumar is also a masterful storyteller.  He knows exactly when to cut away to the school portions.  Every flashback reveals a little facet of a character or chips away at a plot point.  He has a couple of recurring elements such as the hands-on-the-chest gesture or the craving for the “Yamunai Aatrile…” song that have sweet, little arcs of their own.  But to me, the pinnacle of his writing skill is the college sequence, which plays in two versions.  It is so splendidly written that it leaves a lump in the throat by the end of the second version.  There are subtle touches (like the way a young Vijay Sethupathi asks the name of a supporting character) that make the two versions distinct.  The two versions say pretty much what needs to be said about fate and how seemingly little choices seem monumental in hindsight. 

If the cinematography of the movie is the eye and the writing the brain, the actors are the heart and soul of ‘96.  Vijay Sethupathi and Trisha, individually and as a pair, well and truly make the movie.  This role is a breeze for the former, who uses his casual body language and undemonstrative dialogue delivery to full effect to bring to life a man who is stuck in a time warp.  This is Trisha’s finest work yet.  She imbues her character with immense warmth.  Of course, the writing plays a part in shaping her performance. (Chinmayi’s voice work is pitch-perfect too.)  But the actress is wonderful here – be it sobbing her heart out in the bathroom or smiling impishly while asking if Vijay is a virgin, she is as ‘alive’ as I have ever seen her.  She also does something nuanced – she underplays the parts where she playfully lords it over Vijay Sethupathi.  There is a refreshing casualness in the way, for instance, she squats on the floor and asks him to sit closer.  Or the way she insists on a clean-shaven appearance.  This dynamic does wonders for their chemistry.  The duo goes into top gear in the concluding portions, working perfectly with one another, knowing exactly when to cede the spotlight to the other.  If Trisha sparkles in the restaurant scene, Vijay Sethupathi is brilliant with the monologue that he delivers about attending a wedding.  Devadarshini and Bagavathi PerumaL have delightful cameos.  But the movie, especially the second half, belongs really to the lead pair and they lift it to great heights.

It is very rare that acting, writing and filmmaking all cohere as well as they do in ‘96.  It is a testament to Prem Kumar’s thoughtfulness and taste that ‘96 comes across as a film that is not only pleasing to the eye but also tugs at our heartstrings, lingering long after the end credits roll.  This is the type of cinema that endures.  This is the kind of cinema that a certain Mr. Kamal Haasan will especially be proud of!

Ravishanker's terrific cartoon of 96:

His website - with numerous nifty sketches and witty writings - is:
https://thezolazone.wordpress.com/


27 comments:

Anupama kumar said...

As usual, ur writing far exceeds the subject :)

Unknown said...

A man who is stuck in a Time Warp - beautifully written!

Anupama kumar said...

Let me decode my earlier msg :)... what i meant was, i did not like the movie too much... but ur writing makes it sound like a much better movie than what i saw :)... rangan is the same.. his reviews are sometimes far better than the movie itself :)

Ram Murali said...

Anu - thank you so much. No clarification was needed but I appreciate you taking the effort to clarify. Truly humbled, Didi. :)

Shank - thanks, da! I am glad you enjoyed the movie and liked the write up.

Zola said...

Hey Ram.....I've been trying to snap out of the romantic haze since Deepavali evening but seems you wont let me :)

After seeing this movie (haven't seen ANY movie in a long long time) and after reading your review I've switched loyalties :) :)

Zola said...

"The two versions say pretty much what needs to be said about fate and how seemingly little choices seem monumental in hindsight."

Wow !

Zola said...


Anu : Very Well Said !

Ram Murali said...

Ravishanker -
Thank you for your kind words of encouragement.
"switched loyalties"? viLakkam please!

Zola said...

Idhukkellaam vilakkam thevaya ? :)

I'm wondering whARHt clue to give you........

Ram Murali said...

Hydari lendhu HariKRISHNAN-uku thaavitingaLaa? Irunga irunga eppa Appa kitte sollaren. (Avarum bayangara ARH fan. Don't think he is as disloyal as you are! LOL!)

Anusha said...

This movie didn’t really work for me the way I expected it to. I thought it’s quite unhealthy to be fixated on some infatuation you experienced when you were 15...that too for 22 years without being in touch, based on some fleeting moments. Plus he’s a virgin? I just felt like that movie was someone’s fantasy, possibly someone who had their heart mildly broken when they was fifteen, and is forever trying to recapture the intensity of feeling felt in adolescence. Also I didn't like the names of the characters.. Ramachandran to signify the virginal virtuous hero who only thinks of one woman his whole life... And a Janaki who has to go across the ocean to an island? I’ll stop now. ��
I liked the flashback portions better. I am not that heartless. ��

Zola said...

"Parava illiye. Kandupuduchittiye !" (Kaaki Chattai Act III Scene II)

Zola said...

Good one Anusha ! That's pretty much a review :)

Anu Warrier said...

I'm not likely to watch this movie, but I thought Rahini eviscerated it in the comments on BR's blog. From what I've read of it, I must say I'm in the camp of a majority of ladies who were thoroughly skeeved by the characters. It seems to me that men liked the film more. :)

Ram Murali said...

Thank you, Anusha, Ravishanker and Anu, for your comments.

Anu - I did read Rahini's comments. All I will say is that Vijay Sethupathi, and by extension the film, treats the Trisha character with tremendous respect and dignity.

Srini said...

Great writing Ram. I totally loved the movie.

Couple of things I would like to point out
1. Typically in a reunion party there will be alcoholic drinks and some drama around drunkards. How he avoided that simply superb.

2. Also in the CHENNAI metro scene where he shows the close up of a led sign “please mind the gap” while Vijay and Trisha are sitting with an empty seat in the middle 👍🏻👍🏻

Kudos to Premkumar and his team.

Ram Murali said...

Thank you, Srini. Yes, detail #2 was a sweet little touch.

Anonymous said...

among all the hype and superstars, this movie is a refreshing breeze-the movie is so wholesome-so clean-such attention to small details. left an indelible mark-especially after I watched it after watching the horrible Sarkar

Anu Warrier said...

Ram,

If you remember, Rahini's comments weren't about how Vijay or the film treats Trisha. It is about their characterisation, and the sheer inanity of the premise.

As a woman, if I were to meet my first crush after 22 years, and he was still holding onto thoughts of the girl I was, and hadn't moved on, I would slowly, carefully make my way away from him, and ensure that he's blocked on all avenues of contact. Please listen to the women - it is not romantic. It is is not normal. It is creepy. The man has serious issues - the 'one who got away' is the least of it.

Again, I haven't watched the film so I won't get into an argument about it based on second-hand information, but I still have nightmares about Rhythm. So allow me to stay far away from such fetishisation of what can best be termed an infatuation. :)

Ram Murali said...

Anu - I can see your POV.
But the movie clearly worked for me.

As a story, it is well told. As a movie, it is well narrated and beautifully acted. Sometimes a movie is so well made that it makes you buy it's central conceit. 96 was one such movie, at least for me. The part I mentioned about the respect and dignity was because it was one of the elements of the film that was really striking to me. Let me just say that I felt the director did full justice to the subject he took. Whether or not the premise works, I suppose, will determine one's enjoyment of the film.

Anu Warrier said...

Ram, sure. Films resonate with us sometimes in ways in which we cannot comprehend. Which is why I always feel that viewers watch the same film but come out having seen different ones.

And as I said, this was an academic debate for me because I haven't watched the film. Please know that I'm in no way knocking you for having enjoyed the film.

And that's true in the case of Rhythm as well. You enjoyed it, I didn't. :) That's all there's to it.

Ram Murali said...

Anu, no offense taken because I know that no offense was meant. :)
Have you seen the Before... trilogy? You might enjoy that series. Of the three, I like Before Sunset the most. Very honest work. I think it helped that the leads co wrote it.

Zola said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ram Murali said...

Post updated with Ravishanker's brilliant, ingenious cartoon.

Zola said...

Thanks so much for hosting my cartoon Ram !

Your review is the best frame for it.

Surprising how many islands there are in our small place Madras.

Very few people got the gag immediately.

So your review came in very handy. Now they know the context.....and the sub texts :):)

Zola said...

Just saw the label "bonus cartoon"

Thanks so much Ram !

Unknown said...

Hi Anu,

Regarding your first comment on this topic - I feel a little bid odd when I have experiences of actuality of how my own classmates still relive of their first crush and whom they avoid to meet, since it could invite or arouse certain uncomfortable emotions in themselves.

However, I feel we need to differentiate what it means to be, being Romantic and being in love. Relationship Therapist had drawn a clear distinction to my knowledge. When you say "listen to women - it is not romantic. it reminds me Ms. Perel's view of independent women are put off by guyz who are so mightily caring. In the lexicon of the modern love - romantic prospect means "being desirable".

I have listened to some of my close women friends and also the ones with whom I have had deep conversations, they all are still in awe of their FIRST LOVE!! They subtly indicate a certain sense of loss of their own being. They avoid contact not because they instinctively dislike the other's adoration never having vanished but rather it is an act of self-restraint, a product of survival instinct. There is a lot at stake for the people who they have become now.

But to appreciate Mr. Kamal's viewpoint - do not go near people whom you revere - you might get disappointed" is quite valid. So meeting the people for whom we have constructed shrines in our heart (recollect the Hollywood film - My ex-super girl friend - the villain in this film is in awe of his ex-girl friend, who has acquired some para natural abilities to fly and save the earth or species), if they have become a different person with different perspectives in lives that are in contravention of ours - we literally fall off the cliff (metaphorically speaking).

Aside from the above, I feel the references like - "he is a creep" is too harsh and lacks empathy or appreciation of the adoration one has for the other. Without adoration/veneration - how does one instinctively feel the urge to strike a conversation or even ask for a date? The Hitch film underscores that. Love could otherwise mean - Levelling One's Veritable Eagerness.

Of course, I fully agree, this is not your piece of cake. There I completely respect you.

With every good wish,

Thandri