Here is the thing about one of
the famous tropes in Tamil cinema – the flashback. Sometimes it actually makes no logical sense,
especially when it involves a song sequence.
Sample the scene that leads into the freedom struggle segment in Indian.
Sukanya, playing the ageing wife of the former freedom fighter Senapathi (memorably essayed by Kamal Hassan), asks the CBI
officer in disguise, “What the hell do you know about freedom struggle?” The story goes back 50 years to the
pre-independence era. A rousing 20-minute
sequence follows. We then cut back to
the present scene involving Sukanya. So,
let’s think – what would she have been narrating to the officer? That she danced to “Kappal Yeri Poyaachu” and
changed costumes a dozen times to reflect the myriad ethnic Indian wear?! But I can bet my life’s
debt…err, earnings…on the fact that not one member of the packed audience at
Satyam Theater was thinking this way back in 1996 when the movie was released!
The flashback sequence packs a
tremendous punch, not missing a single emotional beat despite all the grandeur
and special effects. This sequence is
meant to offer an explanation for the violent ways of the protagonist. The emotional wallop is complete in a second
flashback in the second half featuring his daughter Kasthuri. If the freedom struggle portions sowed the seeds
for violence as a justifiable means to a utopian end, the village portions
ensure that our emotional investment in Senapathi is complete. (Even here, did
Senapathi, who had a corrupt doctor at the edge of his knife, tell him, “We
sang and danced to the lovely ‘Patchai KiLigaL’ song?” Of course, I don’t need an answer!) Now we are not only empathizing with him but
also rooting for him to take out the corrupt,
societal weeds the way he deems appropriate.
The flashback has been a part and
parcel of the grammar of Tamil cinema.
It is an efficient way to reveal the motivations of a character. It is a tool that allows writers to chart a
narrative arc, while achieving a dramatic high.
It also forces them to be economical.
For instance, the delightful Karthik segment in Mouna Raagam plays for only 24 minutes from start to finish. Yet Karthik made a career out of playing
variations (not always nearly as well written, of course) of this character! These segments allow the writers to build to an episode within the bigger picture, with a climax of its own, even if
it means a tone that is different from the rest of the film. Though not regarded a commercial classic the
way Indian is, the standalone segment
in Jeans is a standout. Radhika steals these scenes with her
expansive performance, her diction, her body language and her piercing stares
all fitting in perfectly with her character, one that has shades of gray. (It is a testament to her skill as a
performer that she made her abrupt transition in the second half work.) Up
until this flashback sequence, Jeans
meanders along. It is with this short,
powerful segment that Shankar ensures that the first half doesn’t come across
as totally slight.
Never one to shy away from
experimentation, K Balachander used the flashback to great effect in several of
his movies. One of his greatest efforts AvargaL, worked precisely because of the
back and forth nature of the storytelling.
Told linearly, it would not have worked nearly as well in giving us
glimpses into the complex, sometimes confused mind of the lead, played
splendidly by Sujatha. This narrative
form allowed KB to establish the specter of the Rajnikanth character looming
ominously over the life of Sujatha. This brings a sense of urgency to the narration,
making us wish for her happiness and for her to end up with a man (played with
finesse and restraint by Kamal) that has a sad past of his own.
The one kind of flashback that I
am not a fan of is the one where a sad scene opens a movie, only for us to
immediately travel back in time. Even in
undisputed classics such as 16
Vayathinile, I find it to serve little purpose except to forewarn us to a
sad end. In movies like Mudhal Mariyadhai, Housefull and Duet, the
initial scenes give away a little too much.
In the marvelous cult classic Hey
Ram, it works both ways. The present
day scenes offer a telling counterpoint to the communal violence of the
pre-independence days. But it is the
same narrative style that, at least for me, robbed the crucial shootout
sequence (where Shah Rukh Khan ends up losing his life) of tension. Thanks to the present day scenes that had
preceded this, I knew that nothing untoward would happen to the Kamal
character. The one movie where the
solemn-first-scene trope worked exceptionally well was Bharathi Kannama. The old
character played by Vijaykumar is apparently waiting for his daughter and
son-in-law to return. We think that Meena
(his daughter) and Parthiban (her love interest) will return. What happens in the climax, of course, is
entirely unexpected and all the more stunning because of the skillful setup.
The other aspect about flashbacks
that I find to be especially important is the build up. The best of writers find the most appropriate
places to introduce the flashback segments.
The twin flashbacks in Rhythm are placed at just the perfect
place in the narration, allowing us to relate deeper to the central characters,
leading to an intermission where each of them have learned about the passing
away of the other person’s spouse and the tragic coincidence. Of course, the flashback of flashbacks is the
one in Baasha. The entire first half is essentially an 80-min
lead-in to the unforgettable introduction of the don character and his bĂȘte
noire Raghuvaran.
As the newer generation of
writers and directors strive to make a mark in Tamil cinema, I hope that they
use but not abuse flashbacks that can, when conceived and executed
thoughtfully, really help them achieve peaks in their narration. They just have to flash back to the
classics of Tamil cinema to see how it was done effectively. And of course, by coming up with ingenious
ways of incorporating flashbacks (Rang De
Basanti is probably unsurpassed in this aspect) they will only be
flashing forward to a glorious era of cinema!
******