Let’s
assume that you have an annual pass to a museum. Driven by an
inexplicable passion for art, you go there every weekend, roam around and stare
at painting after painting. Each time you look at a particular favorite
of yours, you experience a high but struggle to find the right reasons or words
to express what it is about the painting that yanks you out of the present and
lifts you to a different plane. But one day, you pick up a newspaper and
read an exquisitely crafted write-up on this work of art and it changes your
perceptions of art, makes you dig deeper, makes you question certain choices
that the artist would have made and helps you engage your intellect as opposed
to just your senses. In this case, is it just the artist that has
inspired you? What about the author of that write-up? What is his
role in your enriching your experience? Is he an inspiration as
well?
National
award winning film critic Baradwaj Rangan, through his intelligent, witty and
thought provoking essays on film and filmmakers has certainly enriched my movie
watching experience manifold. I wrote about Kamal Hassan earlier in my
Inspirations series and how he routinely – for well beyond the duration of a movie
- transported me to the worlds that he was creating as a writer and as an
actor. (“Mahanadhi” is a case in point.) But in Rangan, I see a person
that will help me traverse the worlds that are created by an actor or a director, respectfully question the paths, twists and turns and yet, never
hesitate to express my unabashed admiration and love for the works of a
creator.
With
my strong interest in writing and my even stronger interest in watching movies,
Rangan’s write-ups make me enjoy my two strong passions to the fullest. But more
importantly, they help me articulate my own thoughts. I will give you an
example. In his wonderful book, “Conversations with Mani Ratnam,” he
routinely discusses casting choices from Vijaykumar in “Agni Natchathiram” to
Manisha Koirala in “Bombay” and Jayasudha in “Alai Paayuthey.” Up until I
read the book, I had never quite thought of what may have gone into casting
certain actors for certain roles, be it the major or the minor ones.
Then, when I watched “Jigarthandaa” and “Madras” recently, I appreciated one
casting choice while questioning another. In “Jigarthandaa,” one of the
hilarious segments involve an acting coach who teaches the basics of acting to
a gangster. A little known character actor was cast in the role.
And, he did quite well too. But I felt that the director Karthik Subburaj
should have chosen a better known actor, say one like Nasser who is known to
take acting very seriously and played off his image. I thought that a well-known face would have lent the role more
gravitas. On the other hand, I liked the fact that Jayabalan (the
antagonist from “AadukaLam”) was cast in what was actually a minor role in "Madras." The fact that his face adorned the huge wall that became the bone of
contention to two warring factions in the movie made me appreciate the
Director for his choice. He utilized Jayabalan’s image from “AadukaLam” well and ensured
that the wall (with his image) gained a life of its own during the movie.
With
his keen observations and thoughtful word choices, he has also made me look at
movies that I have loved immensely over the years, through a fresh set of eyes. His write-up on "Anbe Sivam" and the chapter in his book on “Nayagan” are two examples. As much
as I love “Anbe Sivam” and had come to terms with its minor flaws, he
made me think about Kamal’s indulgences as a writer while not losing sight of
his wonderful performance as an actor. And, one of the things that you will
notice in his writings is a certain respect for filmmakers that strive to make
good, even if flawed, cinema. His write-ups on Selvaraghavan’s works may
make people think that he cuts too much slack for Directors with unique touches
but imperfect execution. But dig deeper, you will see that he does not
turn a blind eye to the flaws in, say a “Mayakkam Enna,” a flawed film,
yes. But a fascinating character study nevertheless. Thanks to his
writings, I have been able to think deeper about the disparate elements that
combine to make a whole picture rather than just giving a one-dimensional, “I loved
it” or “I hated it” kind of a response.
The
intelligence and intellect doesn’t mean that his writing does not have an
element of fun. Wit, understated humor and occasional cheeky irreverence
all mark his work. For instance, he concluded his scathing review of "Anjaan" with the following line - "You go in expecting a meal and you end up with a… toothpick."
If I were to pick one element of his writings that I generally disagree with, it's his writings on movies and filmmakers from an earlier era. While he undoubtedly respects a Sridhar or a Sivaji and appreciates a "Motor Sundaram Pillai" and Sivaji's understated acting in that movie, I wish some of his writings would also incorporate some more context and history that may make the current generation appreciate the works of an earlier generation. For instance, I remember reading that he was not a huge fan of Sridhar's works except for the music and cinematography. Of course, he is entitled to his opinions of Sridhar's movies. But I also wish that he had written about how Sridhar's dialogues and direction heralded a new era where conversations were unfussy (as opposed to the dramatic, long-winded dialogues of the "Manohara" days) and how he essentially sparked off a wave of triangular (and sometimes even quadrangular!) love stories.
All said and done, you must be wondering what is so inspirational about a person that helps me
experience movies better. Well, one of my favorite lines in “Sindhu
Bhairavi” is one uttered by Suhasini to Sivakumar – “Neenge oru genius; naan
oru veri pudicha rasigai!” If you remember that scene, you will remember the
kind of high that Suhasini experiences as a rabid fan of music, one who is
yearning to learn and evolve…just as a fan, not as a creator. Well,
Rangan helps me channel my ‘veri pudicha rasanai’ for the movies in new
ways. If I am the movie equivalent of the art fanatic roaming the halls
of the museum, then he is the newspaper critic giving the wanderer some very
good direction! And that I find to be truly inspirational in its own way.
Start watching at 18:18
2 comments:
Such a wonderful write up. I thoroughly enjoy bardwaj rangan's blogs.
Thank you for your kind words.
Post a Comment